Intrepid journalist blows the cover on the teacher shortage!

Ah, this article is like an old friend. You see, there are really only three things that journalists like to write about teachers. One and two have to do with things you might see on a "ripped from the headlines" episode of Law & Order: Make People Paranoid Unit, often involving some misunderstanding of how the internet works. Thankfully, the author of this article focuses on number three: the famous teacher shortage.

You see, every year someone looks around and notices that there aren't really enough teachers in certain important subject areas, typically math, science and special ed. The reasons are trotted out one after another, like the standard parts of a Greek comedy. Low pay. Red tape. Lack of autonomy. Too much autonomy. And so on. But not until the end of the article does the author approach the real issue:

"Shortages have long been noted in special education, math, science and educational assistant positions in our state. As the state survey noted, it's a deep-rooted – and complex – issue to tackle. '[N]o single action will magically correct the balance of supply versus demand.'"

And then the article ends. Isn't the next logical step to examine the actions that could be taken? That's really what's important here. Too many people are being accepted into teaching programs where they learn to be, broadly, English or Social Studies teachers. I know I was. Maybe if there was an actual dialogue in the press about how the problem can be fixed, some progress could be made.

That sound you just heard was me stepping down from my soap box.

We tired few, we overused Shakespearian allusions...

If there's anything my first year or so as a teacher lacked, it was a consistent curriculum. I taught three different varieties of social studies while student teaching, but my first paying gig was in an English department. Not exactly what I set out to do, but when you're a liberal arts major, you roll with the punches.

Now, it's an international law that every English class has to include a Shakespeare play or two. It doesn't matter what content or continent is covered, the bard has to be a part of it. My class read Romeo and Juliet along with 98% of the rest of the world. Nothing like a little teenage suicide to lighten up fourth period.

As great as Mercutio and the rest of Verona's rich and violent are, my favorite play was always Henry V, which is great because I'm not at all alone. I've read not one, but two books recently where the play's language is alluded to, and they could not be more different.

The first, by Christopher Moore, was A Dirty Job. It's the overly-gonzo story of a wishy-washy guy who becomes Death, or at least a death. He collects people's souls when they die. The book has its moments, some good and many bad, but it's about the last place I expected to see someone charging into a breach. Of course, this is a reference to that famous line shouted by Henry to his troops at the siege of Harfleur: "Once more unto the breach dear friends, once more; or close the wall up with our English dead." It is rendered thus in Moore's words:

"What irony, that he would finally summon his courage and charge into the breach, only to end up lost and stuck in the breach."

The story's protagonist finds himself both heading through the wall and closing it up at the same time. This cannot be a coincidence. The word "breach" when used this way is meant summon visions of Kenneth Branagh on horseback. Why did Moore decide that this was the image he wanted his comically inept hero to project?

Michael Lewis wants to conjure up similar connotations in his book Liar's Poker when he cribs from Henry's St. Crispen's Day speech. This is the speech of "band of brothers" fame, which lends its words to HBO miniseries and Confederate marching songs alike. Here's Lewis, describing a group of traders:

"No, there was no finer place to be in January 1985 than with Michael Mortara's righteous few, that rich band of brothers, the mortgage traders of Salomon Brothers."

Now, I like the way Lewis adapts Shakespeare's language. Henry's men were the "happy few," Mortara's the "righteous." Henry's men sally forth to slaughter Frenchmen, the traders pillage the savings and loan market. And Lewis isn't the only one in the book to use the phrase. Later on, another Salomon trader says, "We were a band of brothers."

Still, why is it that this play continues to be counted on by absurdist writers and Wall Street hotshots as a cheat sheet for how to talk in high leverage situations? Isn't there some other piece of martial high drama that can be called upon during climactic battles and inspiring board meetings? Why is Henry V the Elizabethan equivalent of Jock Jams?

I won't even mention Moore's Julius Caesar reference. Here's hoping someone writes something to take some of the pressure off of Shakespeare soon. In the meantime, let's just let Henry speak for himself:

http://www.chronique.com/Library/Knights/crispen.htm

AL Still Awesome. NL, Well, At Least They Tried.

Well, the AL won again tonight, for something like the 22nd year in a row. Lots of nice moments tonight. There was Crawford's amazing catch, Granderson's triple, Edwin Jackson's scoreless inning... and I'm sure someone on the NL team did something. They did have six base runners, which is... just precious. They were really trying there. The National League is just so cute.

We also learned that President Obama knows what a cutter is. A very excited Mariano Rivera relayed this news in his post-game interview. I'm actually kind of impressed. Bush was a huge baseball fan, and I'm pretty sure he'd think a cutter was some sort of new WMD. So good game, informed president, what could be better? If only this one didn't count.

The Home Run Derby (now with more gerbils!)

We should just get Reason Number Two I'm a bad teacher out of the way. I just might like baseball more than I like my students. For instance, instead of working on the yearbook, I am watching the Home Run Derby and, as of now, blogging. Which is really the best use of my time. To be fair, it is not entirely my fault. The website I use to make yearbook edits does not like my computer, or (perhaps) my internet connection, or (probably) some combination of the two. So, without further ado, here's an impromptu Home Run Derby 2009 Running Diary!

We join the action as Albert Pujols, Joe Mauer and Carlos Pena, all tied with something like 5 HRs, enter into a swing off to see who goes to the semifinals. Our groan-inducing hosts are Chris Berman, Joe Morgan and Steve Phillips.

8:53: Albert Pujols wins the "swing off" or whatever the hell they're calling it to advance to the semifinals. Joe Morgan is really excited about the new high leg kick Pujols featured during his last at bat.

8:57: David Wright looks way to excited to be advertising for that movie about the gerbils with guns. Actually, he looks a little bit like a gerbil. What makes it even better is that Tracy Jordan recorded a bunch of little gerbil-esque phrases for them to use during the HR derby.

9:03: Pujols has to hit at least 6 HRs to stay alive. Joe Morgan continues to gush over the high leg kick, bringing up guys no one under the age of 120 remembers as comparisons. That's one of them (Mel Ott) in the picture, by the way.

9:07: So, Pujols hits the gold ball 432 feet, adding to the amount of money State Farm will donate to the Boys and Girls Club. It's at $352,000 at this point. So, basically, if Pujols doesn't hit a home run, some poor kids have to keep playing baseball with a rock and a rusty tire iron? I feel good about this.

9:09: Steve Phillips tells us that Pujols has the entire city of St. Louis on his shoulders tonight. Things must be getting pretty bad in Missourah. If Pujols doesn't win tonight, does St. Louis sink into the Mississippi River or something? I feel like we need to know this sort of thing.

9:20: Ryan Howard whacks 8 in Round Two to give him a total of 15. He's got the lead right now, but Nelson Cruz and Prince Fielder still have to hit. Each of them has 11 HRs.

9:23: Never have the words "Dylan McDermott" and "dangerous" been uttered in the same sentence before. Until now. Thank you, Jerry Bruckheimer, for bringing them all together.

9:26: Nelson Cruz is up, and continues to hit the ball harder and farther than anyone else tonight. He is routinely hitting balls into the third deck at this point. Even more interesting, ESPN has decided that people cannot see baseballs when they are hit. They've got this green/yellow tail that shows up when the ball is hit a certain distance in the air. Apparently they've forgotten about the tragedy of the "NHL on Fox." I mean, does baseball really need a glow puck? If I can't see a baseball on my HD TV, not only do I need eye surgery or a seeing eye dog, I probably won't be watching the Home Run Derby. Nobody who doesn't like baseball already is going to flick on the derby and say, "Hey, you know what? I'd watch this if the ball looked more like a green spermatozoa."

9:34: Chris Berman dusts off his tired "BACK BACK BACK BACK" call for an underwhelming Prince Fielder home run. You could tell his heart wasn't in it. Earlier, he gave Nelson Cruz the nickname "Cruz-in' Around the World." ESPN really needs to put Boomer out to stud. Can I sign a petition for this or something?

9:36: Fielder's in a groove. He just launched one 504 feet. Wow. I don't know how he doesn't dislocate his shoulder on every swing. Despite how long Cruz's home runs have looked, apparently Fielder has the top 4 distances in the derby.

9:39: I remember watching Prince Fielder come out for batting practice when his dad was with the Tigers. Prince could hit the ball a long, long way, and he was only something like 10 at the time. He looked just like Cecil, only younger. Prince's son (named Jaden, of all things) is roaming along the first base line today. He looks nothing like the other Fielders, from his bouncy fro to his complete lack of a home run gut (a lot like a beer gut, only made of apple pie and lemonade and Bing Crosby songs). Something tells me he won't be playing an overweight first base for the Baltimore Orioles in 16 years.

9:42: Erin Andrews interviews Curtis Granderson. Some moments are just too perfect for words.

9:48: Nelson Cruz hits a ball that Chris Berman says "had hair on it." Apparently they forgot to shave the State Farm Gold Balls after they picked them from the gold ball trees today.

9:56: Prince Fielder has to hit all of 6 HRs to win this thing. He's got two big ones already, and only one out.

9:57: Prince hits one foul so hard for his third out he says ________________. Or, at least that's what we hear from the broadcast. Thankfully, the bleep also cuts off Joe Morgan, always a plus.

10:00: Right at 10, Fielder whacks his 6th of the final round to win it. Boys and Girls Club kids rush over to wipe his face off with towels. And someone wearing a microphone has the most awkward laugh I've ever heard. Seriously, I can't figure out a way to transcribe it. You'll have to trust me.

That's it for the first badteacher. running diary. I am a little disappointed to be quitting before the celebrity softball game. I mean, Billy Bob Thornton, a random Backstreet Boy, and Pam from The Office? And Nelly?!? What a group. I'm off to wrestle with the yearbook demons. Back tomorrow, same angst time, same angst channel.

"Laters," indeed.

One of my favorite classes to teach is journalism. We get to do a lot of cool things that you don't get to do in other classes, things like taking pictures with 7 mp cameras and writing newspaper articles riddled with horrendous grammatical errors. My favorite headline so far: "Ashley's Honor Roll!" You know, like, she's on the honor roll, but she's also on a roll? Oh boy.

Journalism is a fun class for both students and teachers, but it is a difficult class to regulate. Some students are in the class because they are legitimately interested. Unfortunately, the rest tend to be seniors who want a little break. Now, I understand this. Seniors have a lot going on. They've been through four years of hard work and are ready to do something new with their lives. They've also been told by some foolish, sad adults that "High school was the best four years of my life." So they're a little concerned, understandably, about what might possibly be wrong with the rest of the world. You could argue that seniors deserve a class where they get to slack off, search the internet and hit/hit on one another without teacher interference while they are still basically (tall) children.

Of course, if you're the teacher, or even one of the underclassmen in the same class, you can't help but disagree with this stance. Even if we forget for a moment that classes are supposed to contain instruction and, theoretically, learning, there are problems. Like everyone else has to do a lot more work. Which is why, despite the wonderful, better than half-assed effort put in by my freshmen, sophomores and juniors, I am editing the yearbook on a beautiful, if rainy, July afternoon.

It's not that bad. Our yearbook doesn't come out until the fall. And yes, I know that 98% of the adult world is shifting uncomfortably in a cubicle or cheating death in a salt mine while I type frivolities and listen to a baseball game. Still, any work hereon out is my responsibility. Is this my fault? Heck yes it is. We could even call this Reason Number One why I am a Bad Teacher. I did not motivate my students effectively enough where they completed the yearbook themselves. The class went well this year, but clearly I can improve on it. So, how do you continue motivating students to excel in a class they think should be easy, especially when so many of them re-take it every year so they can work on the yearbook and newspaper? Stay tuned.

To start, a confession.

I may not actually be a bad teacher, at least not as bad as the woman in the banner. I certainly do not have a red lightsaber. If I had a lightsaber, I'm pretty sure mine would be a nice aquamarine. And though this clearly proves that I am not an evil jedi, I'm not sure what it says about me as a teacher. I am new, with just about a year and some student teaching under my belt, and easily distracted. It really doesn't take much.

For example, there I was, in the middle of notes on participles or some other middle school English nonsense, and this pops into my head:

"I'm a mother lover, you're a mother lover, we should f*ck each others' mothers..."

Now, as entertaining as this SNL digital short is, it has no place in the classroom, unless by "classroom" you mean "bar." Of course, instead of doing what any rational, sane person would do and burying the song deep down so I could focus on the lesson, I started half-humming, half-singing along as I switched transparencies. I may have thrown in a few embarrassing subliminal dance moves as well, I'm not sure.

Of course, then I had to explain my lack of dance skills and why I couldn't do something called the "stanky leg." So much for participles.

Where was I? Oh yes, distraction, and much of it. That may be a theme of this blog. It should, really should focus on my classroom misadventures, but of course other things will pop up here and there. I apologize in advance for any gag-inducing jokes, reviews of superhero movies, and Ghostbusters references. There will likely be a few.